I have voted for this mapset!
Additional comments:
4K vote :yippie:
Hekireki
3 weeks ago
oge
QuaverBot
3 weeks ago
The creator has just updated their mapset, and its status has been changed back to Resolved.
7xbi
3 weeks ago
I have on-hold this mapset because:
The mapset's timing is incorrect, and requires an offset or additional timing point(s).
apply +5ms offset
.
The mapset has issues with metadata.
> gamemodes should always be capatalized, like "4K S..." instead of "4k S..."
re: https://wiki.quavergame.com/docs/Ranking/Criteria#markers
> you could add "Melodic" to the tags as well
Hekireki
3 weeks ago
2592-29050 made the patterning more symmetrical
applied similarly in 50925 and 77592
ending, made the stuff that surrounds the following pattern 177696|6,177800|4,177904|3,178008|6,178112|4,178216|3,178633|6,178737|4,178841|3 more rolly ( first half only 178321|7,178425|5,178529|1, second half 184987|1,185091|3,185196|7,185612|1,185716|3,185821|7
QuaverBot
3 weeks ago
The creator has just updated their mapset, and its status has been changed back to Resolved.
netzoid
3 weeks ago
I have on-hold this mapset because:
I am making suggestions for one or multiple difficulties in the mapset.
2592 -> 29050
although not a problem, this section feels very lacking in the overall note placement due to the lack of pitch relevancy here. Pitch relevancy especially in lower difficulty charts, are pretty important to make a non boring chart so including pitch relevancy here would be really cool (like placing notes to the 1st column if the pitch is really low and the 7th column if its high)
177592 vs 124259 and more notably 184259
these sections are really similar in difficulty but the intensity difference of both songs is fairly frastic, could add some contrast here to differentiate the two
Additional comments:
check modding
Hekireki
4 weeks ago
I have just submitted my mapset to the ranking queue!
